I’ve made fixes long time ago before Ben left. + my change is in Pharo image.
Is this enough? Uko On 04 Sep 2014, at 11:39, Christophe Demarey <[email protected]> wrote: > Yes, you should add a slice in the Pharo inbox with your contribution but ... > it depends under which license you first published your contribution. If it > was MIT, it is fine (and spec is out of law). If it was the double licensing, > we will not be able to integrate it into Pharo. We should re-implement this > functionality. > I know these things are boring but we should take care to avoid potential > problems in the future. > > Le 4 sept. 2014 à 11:13, Yuriy Tymchuk a écrit : > >> Oh wow, it’s amazing how complicated things can get… What you I have to do >> to have fixes available in Pharo? Send a slice to Pharo inbox? I just want >> to use dark theme in pharo and don’t have ugly UI parts >> >> Uko >> >> On 04 Sep 2014, at 10:52, Christophe Demarey <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> >>> Le 3 sept. 2014 à 10:24, Torsten Bergmann a écrit : >>> >>>> It is interesting that there is also a new Spec release [2] announced this >>>> week >>> >>> I can see in the announce: >>> Adds SpecTableLayout, thanks @webwarrior-ws >>> Removes hardcoded colors, thanks @Uko >>> >>> Do the authors of contribution (or their company if the contribution is >>> done at work) agree on the new spec license? >>> If not, it cannot be part of the new spec and could be integrated in Pharo >>> spec. >>> If so, we won't be able to integrate these fixes in Pharo. >>> >>> It woud be good that spec contributors clarify their position. >>> >>> Regards, >>> Christophe. >>> >> >
