Nobody knows? This thread is frightening... Le 20 sept. 2014 12:29, "Ben Coman" <[email protected]> a écrit :
> > I have two tickets open on Penelope... > https://pharo.fogbugz.com/default.asp?11550 > https://pharo.fogbugz.com/default.asp?11551 > > I'd be happy to give them a go myself if I had access to the code and be > able to test it. > cheers -ben > > > Marcus Denker wrote: > > > On 17 Sep 2014, at 13:02, Nicolai Hess <[email protected]> wrote: > > Yes but, > > 2014-09-17 11:25 GMT+02:00 Marcus Denker <[email protected]>: > >> Hello, >> >> There are right now 675 open issues. (we managed to close 63 just the >> last 7 days...). >> >> A lot of those issues are very old. A lot are in a bad shape: >> >> -> not reproducible >> -> *completely* unclear what action could lead to solve the issue >> -> outdated (e.g. small improvements submitted ages ago, but even >> the author does not care to submit a new version for Pharo4) >> >> I think we should be more radical in closing issues. If someone submits >> something >> but can not even answer a simple question in 2 months --> this is the same >> as "I don't care". >> > > 2 months are to short. 4 or maybe 6. > > Yes, you are right 6 months is good. > > The idea is that the issue will be closed, but with a mail to the > "owner" of the issue so that > he/she can decide to re-open... and "will work on that later" would be a > valid answer. > > There are open issues without any action on our part - for months. > And that does > not mean "we don't care". If someone reports an issues and don't > have the time to react on comments/questions for a couple of months, I > understand that. > > > nicolai > > >> >> So *PLEASE*: >> >> -> check all the issue that *you* submitted. Are they still relevant? >> Is there enough >> information for anyone to do anything? >> -> check all the issues you where involved with in discussions. It is >> much easier for >> you than for me to understand what the conclusion of the discussion is. >> -> help checking *old* entries. Is is still relevant? What is the next >> action? >> > > +1 > > > >> >> >> Marcus >> > > > >
