Le 03/10/2014 13:44, Esteban Lorenzano a écrit : > I’m writing this because I’m sad about what is happening in this list.
Hi Esteban, Don't be sad about negativity. I think it is a sign of good health for Pharo. First of all it is a feedback, it should raise a red flag somewhere: some expectation is not met, or an expectation for even better quality. Then it is a manifestation of hight interest and expectation regarding Pharo. After all the worst will be to ignore Pharo. Of course negative feedback are hard to manage emotionally, because those feedbacks can be improperly emotionally expressed. I guess with time people get thick skin to manage it. With Pharo becoming successful, the ratio of pure consumer will raise exponentially, there is nothing you can do with that, but well the net number of contributors will raise also... and still your number should not be that bad because your consumers are developers. (if you compare with DrGeo user, most are pure consumers) Hilaire -- Dr. Geo - http://drgeo.eu iStoa - http://istoa.drgeo.eu
