Tudor wrote:
>Indeed. This was a discussion I wanted to spawn as well. I would prefer to
>change the name from Workspace to Playground in the World Menu. The reason is
>>that the Playground is such a distinct departure from the Workspace that it
>deserves a different name.
I do not think it is a departure from the Workspace concept.
Therefore I would keep "Workspace" for the menu item name and the window name.
It would be enough if the initial
tab is called "Playground" because one can play in the code pane (or do serious
stuff).
This way we would keep up with a known concept (also from other IDE's), it
meets what people would expect and
no books would have to be rewritten ;)
BTW: Squeak had a goodie with something similar back in the days (cant remember
the name). It was neat as one
could assemble different objects and different object representations in
one navigateable window.
>>I would suggest to use the well known order "Cut","Copy","Paste".
>Thanks for noticing. This will be fixed.
Thanks!
>Indeed, we had a debate about the name. I proposed the solution 3b you
>mention, but it was decided
>that it would be too confusing to change the Cmd+i action at this time, and we
>chose "Go" to be
>the name of the action that is mapped on Cmd+g.
Here we agree - I would have choosen 3b as well. Decided by whom? Did I miss
the discussion in the
list or was it offlist?
>>...icons...
>This is a known issue and we will look at it soon.
Sounds good.
>At the moment, GT is an external project and the contributions should happen
>directly in its repository.
Then please add me to the repo. Still the process is unclear - will I still
provide a slice with
issue number or will I change the config.
It is not very lucky that this process was started (without
discussion/announcement/description first
and only for specific packages).
Thx
T.
