Denis wrote: >>Kilon wrote: >>Smalltalk cannot even begin to compete with the tools and library support of >>these two behemoths programming languages. >> >Just for few cents. >If you group this million tools by logical functionality I'm sure it will be >much less then smalltalk systems have. Most tools just repeat each other. And >you >know most smalltalk development tools are absent in other systems. And >every year when I read ESUG presentations I see another batch of new tools. >I'm not see >such progress in another languages. +1
I tried several of the git tools and basically they all do the same, some at a different level or different representations. There are a few differences in features. Smalltalk has a long history in good tools. Also for versioning (ENVY comes to mind). I like that we can use git - but in the end I fear we somehow will come to a point where it does not fit our needs or provide enough flexibility. That does not mean that we should not use it. But we should be prepared with own tools as well. Bye T.
