2014-12-03 4:16 GMT+01:00 Eliot Miranda <[email protected]>: > > Yes, but *I* care about the Monticello metadata. IMO its *better* than > the git metadata. >
Eliot, you'll have to do better than just IMO on that one. Some of us work with *both*, and have code for going back and forth, so the *better*; bah. I also happens to know how long it takes to parse hundreds of monticello metadata files... and I wasn't impressed with the result. > What's really lacking in Monticello is a) it's not high school so one > can't preen in front of the world on github and b) it has no support for > external files. Well, a) will be solved by growing up and b) can be solved > by building the solution. I know what I'd rather do. > > > [and apologies for being deliberately incendiary but I *hate* the movement > away from tools in Squeak/Pharo. It is a movement towards stasis and > death, and personally I'm enjoying life too much]. > You then have noticed that those threads are about working on tools? Thierry
