I love Chalten :)
But you know it :)

Stef
Le 2/12/14 11:53, Maximiliano Taborda a écrit :
Hi all.

The same examples using Chaltén:
February twentyninth, 2012 next: 1 yearMeasure. "=> February 28th, 2013"
     March first, 2011 next: 1 yearMeasure.  "=> March 1st, 2012"
     March first, 2011 next: 12 monthsMeasure. "=> March 1st, 2012"

Hilaire, In Chaltén a year is a year so you don't need to care about of the number of days in it.

Regards.
Maxi


2014-12-02 16:37 GMT-03:00 Chris Cunningham <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>:

    GenericYear does this.  The generic Year will take
       '2/29/2000' asDate + 1 year "=> 28 February 2001"
    In other words, we want it at the same time next year; more
    importantly the same month and close to what we have now.
    Also:
       '3/1/2001' asDate - 1 year "=> 1 March 2000"
    Still, same month - we want to be at the beginning of the month
    the previous year.

    Basically, my idea (and, more importantly, what I expect - hence
    my code) is that I want to pretend that we do have a field-based
    representation and make it work that way.  except better (since
    there is no 2/29/2001).

    > Ej, which one of the followings is OK?
    > '2011-03-01' asDate + 1 year "=> 2012-02-29"

    Well, I have a bug here.  That needs to be fixed.

    -cbc


    On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 8:34 AM, Sean P. DeNigris
    <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

        Esteban A. Maringolo wrote
        > Ej, which one of the followings is OK?
        > '2012-02-29' asDate + 1 year  "=> 2013-02-28"
        > '2011-03-01' asDate + 1 year "=> 2012-02-29"

        One solution (just ignore the source ha ha) -
        
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/system.datetime.addyears%28v=vs.110%29.aspx



        -----
        Cheers,
        Sean
        --
        View this message in context:
        http://forum.world.st/Duration-year-tp4791727p4793656.html
        Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Developers mailing list archive
        at Nabble.com.




Reply via email to