> On Nov 24, 2014, at 8:34 PM, Esteban Lorenzano <[email protected]> wrote: > > yes, we are slowly moving in the opposite direction of “all maintained in the > image”, and eventually we plan/dream to have a small kernel and a bunch of > configurations to produce Pharo.
This is good. Because we are niche, the “all maintained in the image” strategy never really had a chance. The Python "barely an interpreter that can import anything” strategy is wildly successful so I believe in the minimal kernel, friendly to the terminal that can grow from any direction strategy
