Just wondering, did you actually see this page: http://pharo.org/success
? This is all real, commercially successful stuff. Not that we don't need more traction, but it is important to understand and know what is already there. > On 05 Jan 2015, at 16:41, horrido <[email protected]> wrote: > > SRP has poster children. > > But seriously, Pharo is the "poster child". Seaside and Amber are the poster > children representing the web. > > I'm focussed on Amber because I firmly believe that Smalltalk must have a > good client-side story. The web is so important to the future of Smalltalk. > > > Sven Van Caekenberghe-2 wrote >> Yes I know, and it *is* an interesting project, for sure. >> >> But my remark was in the context of The Smalltalk Renaissance - does it >> really fit ? Is it the best poster child ? > > > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://forum.world.st/On-Twitter-tp4797177p4797863.html > Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >
