Oh yes!
The ESUG talk is particularly cool.

Stef

Le 9/1/15 16:20, Tudor Girba a écrit :
Hi Richard,

A note about the IDE: we put together a team that is working on building the future Pharo IDE. Our goal is not to reproduce existing IDE but created a new and integrated experience that plays to the strengths of Pharo.

This is a rather ambitious project that will likely last a couple of years. You can see our current page here:
http://gt.moosetechnology.org

Regarding the philosophy, you can get some input by watching the "Designing for Developer Experience" talk:
part 1 - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LKVPJU3W5Ys
part 2 - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q9_JDpFq6qI
part 3 - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s9IBGEOPLmY

We think this is worth advertising. Please let me know if it is of interest to you.

Cheers,
Doru



On Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 2:23 PM, horrido <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    I haven't heard from anyone else, which concerns me a little.

    I remind everyone that this campaign is about you. Without your
    participation, it cannot succeed.

    Just drop me a line and tell me which topic you're writing on. You
    may, if
    you wish, create a new topic, as well. My list of topics was
    chosen based on
    the concerns I heard from other developers. Thanks.


    horrido wrote
    > Our first essay (in response to Topic #2)!
    >
    
http://smalltalkrenaissance.wordpress.com/2015/01/06/smalltalk-in-business-italian-style/
    >
    
<http://smalltalkrenaissance.wordpress.com/2015/01/06/smalltalk-in-business-italian-style/>
    >
    > Please step up. We need more.
    >
    > Thanks.
    > horrido wrote
    >> As promised, here is my first list of essay topics. I would
    like to ask
    >> you to submit an essay on one of these topics. Multiple
    submissions are
    >> welcome; if they're good, they will all get published at Smalltalk
    >> Renaissance.
    >>
    >> I will edit the articles for grammar and style. You should look
    good
    >> after I'm done.
    >>
    >> There's no deadline, but obviously the sooner you can write
    them, the
    >> better. SRP is a fast-moving campaign.
    >>
    >> If you have other suggestions for essay topics, please let me know.
    >>
    >> Without further ado, here are the topics...
    >>
    >>
    >> Topic #1:
    >>
    >> How do modern IDEs, such as Eclipse and IntelliJ and Visual Studio,
    >> compare with the tried-and-true Smalltalk development environment?
    >>
    >> -----
    >> Topic #2:
    >>
    >> It is the contention of some critics, including
    >> Robert Martin <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YX3iRjKj7C0>
    >> , that Smalltalk did not (does not?) address the needs of the
    enterprise.
    >> Present a counter-argument.
    >>
    >> Explain how Smalltalk can assist the enterprise in team
    development, in
    >> large-scale development, and in integrating with existing
    (typically
    >> Windows-based) infrastructures.
    >>
    >> Pay particular attention to the question of RDBMS usage, which
    is often
    >> critical in the enterprise.
    >>
    >> -----
    >> Topic #3:
    >>
    >> Some critics complain that Smalltalk does not play well with
    existing
    >> file-based tooling.
    /
    >> Duh!
    /
    >>  Smalltalk is a "new" approach to IDEs and software engineering. We
    >> should be advancing this paradigm with new tooling, rather than
    falling
    >> back on the old again and again. Otherwise, things will never
    change for
    >> the better.
    >>
    >> Make a case for why we should embrace this change now, rather than
    >> waiting (for what?).
    >>
    >> Also, this
    >> webpage
    <http://thoughtstorms.info/view/smalltalkunix/view/smalltalk>
    >>  poses an interesting argument against Smalltalk. Perhaps
    someone can
    >> tackle it.
    >>
    >> -----
    >> Topic #4:
    >>
    >> In the age of multi-core processors and concurrency
    programming, how is
    >> Smalltalk addressing the concerns of developers?
    >>
    >> -----
    >> Topic #5:
    >>
    >> How should we address the issue of compatibility (ie,
    fragmentation)
    >> among various implementations of Smalltalk? Does this issue
    hamper the
    >> creation of an ecosystem of libraries and shared code?





    --
    View this message in context:
    http://forum.world.st/Essay-Topics-tp4797847p4798569.html
    Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Developers mailing list archive at
    Nabble.com.




--
www.tudorgirba.com <http://www.tudorgirba.com>

"Every thing has its own flow"

Reply via email to