On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 2:08 PM, [email protected] <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Le 4 mars 2015 23:08, "Stephan Eggermont" <[email protected]> a écrit : > > > > On 04/03/15 14:19, [email protected] wrote: > > > >> Interesting but not sure I'd like to have images going through > >> decompression everytime I spin them up. > >> Especially if there are a lot of the in a server. > > > > > > 2GB/s is twice as fast as you can get from a fast SSD atm. > > And as that is per core, that puts a boundary of starting > > 2200 pharo images/s on a modern dual socket server. > > After half a minute of that you run out of ram with a > > 1.5TB ram machine. The bottlenecks might be elsewhere. > > There is no way an image starts that fast today. > > There is the delay thing that slows things down. > Is this the code Eliot advised would not be needed when we've moved to the microsecond clock? Can you point me at the code? cheers -ben > > > > > > Norbert wrote: > > > To be sure if you want that you have to test it. You have always take > > into account that a smaller file will have less I/O to read from disk. > > > > +1 > > Ok. > > > > > Stephan > > > > > > > > > > >
