no, copying should not be the solution. but… being able to reconstruct an update is a good reason to not use generic versions (like #development) and instead provide a real fixed version :P
we will need to review this… but not now… for Pharo 5. Esteban > On 17 Mar 2015, at 18:10, stepharo <[email protected]> wrote: > > -> GT is loaded via a Configuration. -> this load from the GT repo, *not* > Pharo40. So this means that it looks in the wrong place I wonder why. Maybe > we should copy the mcz files? This would be good anyway: all code of Pharo40 > is in the Pharo40 repo. Marcus > Yes! > >
