> Am 21.04.2015 um 14:53 schrieb Esteban Lorenzano <[email protected]>: > > >> On 21 Apr 2015, at 14:37, Stephan Eggermont <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> On 21/04/15 13:14, Esteban Lorenzano wrote: >> >>> nope, solution is to explicit version to load :) >> >> Explicit symbolic version, that is. >> Never a fixed number, as that can't be patched. >> That breaks the update process just as well. > > no… explicit fixed number. I need version 1.0.42, not #stable or > #myCoolFantasyNumberWichAfterAllIsEqualButWorstTo-1-0-42 > And of course can be patched…. with version 1.0.43. > That’s the only way to be able to make the update process work. > +1
Norbert
