There is already #comment:stamp:. #comment: makes the stamp <historical>. When would we want that? Or if it's a convenience method, maybe it should pass `... stamp: Author changeStamp`?
Also, it seems that the result of neither of these messages shows up in MC changes browser, even though they do go into the changes file and are committed by MC... ----- Cheers, Sean -- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/TClassDescription-Why-comment-tp4821441.html Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
