> On 23 Apr 2015, at 16:30, Sean P. DeNigris <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> There is already #comment:stamp:. #comment: makes the stamp <historical>.
> When would we want that? Or if it's a convenience method, maybe it should
> pass `... stamp: Author changeStamp`?
>
Yes, we had in the past the problem that comments lost the stamps often…
I wanted to remove all cases where it puts <historical>
> Also, it seems that the result of neither of these messages shows up in MC
> changes browser, even though they do go into the changes file and are
> committed by MC...
>
Hmm.. strange. Maybe the notification is not done correctly?
Marcus
