to find in the end that you get .... what you pay for ;) On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 4:43 PM Esteban Lorenzano <[email protected]> wrote:
> icon design and web design are two very different things. > I seriously doubt we can get the icon set we need as cheap as you might > think. > > but… we can always try :) > > Esteban > > On 24 Apr 2015, at 14:55, [email protected] wrote: > > > > On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 2:33 PM, stepharo <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> >> Le 24/4/15 11:06, [email protected] a écrit : >> >> >> >> On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 9:45 AM, Sven Van Caekenberghe <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> That's a bit harsh, the fonts are the same ;-) >>> And it is of course possible that you don't like it, it is a matter of >>> taste. >>> The contrast thing is also taste, but for some people it solve certain >>> vision problems. >>> >>> Exactly. >> When you have floaters all day long, the last thing you want is a f*cking >> white screen. >> >> Now, I am using 3.0 with DawnTheme, which is more like SublimeText (in a >> 3.0). >> >> I tried the 4.0 and it is nice. Now, icons should get a pass because the >> artefacts on the edges are not nice. >> >> If there is some little petty cash available, that's the kind of job that >> can be done supercheap on something like https://en.99designs.be/. That >> would be good use of consortium/association money for example. >> >> Why bother with graphics work when you can get things done professionaly >> for close to nil? >> >> >> do you know the people? >> Because I would really be in favor getting people doing this job. >> > > This is a large community. > > One can get a full website design done for around $500. > Got that done and was nice work. > > Alternatives (used too): https://www.freelancer.com/ > > Phil > >> >> >> Phil >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> > On 24 Apr 2015, at 09:27, Norbert Hartl <[email protected]> wrote: >>> > >>> > That's funny because I tried it two days ago the first time and I >>> didn't like it. I had troubles to get anything but bitmap fonts. After >>> setting all things up I was a bit disappointed that contrast wise it >>> doesn't work for me. Can someone send a screenshot with one setup that >>> he/she considers good? >>> > >>> > thanks, >>> > >>> > Norbert >>> > >>> >> Am 24.04.2015 um 08:38 schrieb Esteban Lorenzano <[email protected] >>> >: >>> >> >>> >> I disagree… DarkTheme is just for certain tastes, while regular one, >>> while probably dated, is more “standard”. >>> >> Also, DarkTheme is not ready. yeah, yeah… it works and works fine >>> most of the time… but not *all* the time (take for example find string >>> dialog… I never found the time to fix it, and nobody complained so… :P). >>> Finally. we need to adopt SVG icons (in my TODO list since a couple of >>> months, I will deliver soon, I hope), otherwise they do not look good (this >>> is a problem eclipse itself had it… we are just inheriting it :) ) >>> >> >>> >> But a good question would be: How can we push forward our UI, besides >>> using a darker or clearer theme? >>> >> I would like to hear some opinions here :) >>> >> >>> >> Esteban >>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> On 24 Apr 2015, at 08:33, stepharo <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> comments about color is to be taken with care. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Le 24/4/15 02:48, Sean P. DeNigris a écrit : >>> >>>> Why didn't/don't we make it the default for 4.0? Everyone seems to >>> love it, >>> >>>> and people are commenting that the UI looks dated. >>> >>>> >>> >>>> >>> >>>> >>> >>>> ----- >>> >>>> Cheers, >>> >>>> Sean >>> >>>> -- >>> >>>> View this message in context: >>> http://forum.world.st/Release-with-Dark-Theme-tp4821496.html >>> >>>> Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Developers mailing list archive at >>> Nabble.com. >>> >>>> >>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >>> >> >>> > >>> > >> >> >
