> On 13 May 2015, at 11:21, Denis Kudriashov <[email protected]> wrote: > > Thanks's Marcus. It is beautiful thing. > > Is parsing locate errors by "dot"s? I mean how it will parse "3+. 1+2"? It > will be super cool if we have only "3+." as error but remains code as good one >
You can just look at
OpalCompiler new
source: 'method 3+. 1+2';
useFaultyForParsing: true;
parse.
with the GT inspector, it has a very nice AST view:
