Yes, we should fix it…
> On 21 May 2015, at 09:22, Denis Kudriashov <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> But statement after error is parsed and ast node exists for them.
> Is it not correct to make end of error equal to start of next ast node?
>
> 19 мая 2015 г. 11:22 пользователь "Marcus Denker" <[email protected]
> <mailto:[email protected]>> написал:
>
>> On 19 May 2015, at 10:32, Thierry Goubier <[email protected]
>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> 2015-05-19 10:27 GMT+02:00 Marcus Denker <[email protected]
>> <mailto:[email protected]>>:
>>
>>>
>>> And that view get the selection wrong ;)
>>>
>>
>> No, the ErrorNode has “all the rest” as it’s extend for Shout so it can
>> color the error just the same as people are used to.
>>
>> Ok.
>>
>> But I'd really like Shout not to color red the rest of the code when I start
>> to modify code half way through a method :)
>>
>> Is that inherent to the way ErrorNode instances are generated or is it just
>> done to maintain as it was?
>>
>
> I am not entirely sure… it sets the code of the ErrorNode to be just from
> where we are to the end of the to be parsed text.
> At that point it is hard to know the real extend of the error… needs to be
> checked how to do it nicer.
>
> I think we should first get it in a state that we can replace the shout
> parser (both for syntax highlight and code completion).
>
> Marcus
