> On 12 Jun 2015, at 10:40, Stephan Eggermont <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 12-06-15 10:24, Esteban Lorenzano wrote: >> it was just an example of why using #stable in project dependences is a bad >> idea :) >> you made #releaseN.N to fix precisely my point. >> there should exist something like I say “3.*” > > #'release3' always refers to the latest stable 3.*.*.*
I know :) I’m just saying that I would like to have that as a standard mechanism, not a convention. Esteban > >> I’m sorry for being obvious here, I know this is known… problem is that I’ve >> seen far too much the use of metacello not for doing releases but to handle >> commits. > > I think it mostly has to do with the need to have exact reproducible builds > (which is different from the need to have working software). > That would be better handled with a (separate) SnapshotOf class i.m.o. > > Stephan > > >
