Hi,
As i said earlier in the conversation, you have to unload the oswindow
configuration first...
Just execute this before loading the package:
MCPackageLoader unloadPackage: (MCPackage named:
'ConfigurationOfOSWindow')
Merwan
On mar., 2015-07-07 at 17:13 +0200, Natalia Tymchuk wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I tried to load Woden into pharo 4 and 5 images using script:
>
> Gofer new smalltalkhubUser: 'ronsaldo’
> project: 'Woden’;
> package: 'ConfigurationOfWoden’;
> load.
> (#ConfigurationOfWoden asClass project version: #jenkins) load
>
> And in both cases I got the error: 'Name not found: WithOpenGLAndExamples’.
> It looks like version #jenkins, created by JB, doesn’t work.
>
> Best regards,
> Natalia
>
>
> > On 25 Jun 2015, at 20:14, stepharo <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > Yuriy
> >
> > can you check with JB because he told me that he wrote a configuration for
> > Wooden.
> >
> > Stef
> >
> > Le 12/6/15 13:48, Yuriy Tymchuk a écrit :Yuri
> >> Just a quick side note:
> >>
> >> my initial email was kind of a troll. Because when you ask for
> >> something about roassal and 3D, you get a reply about Roassal-Woden i.e.
> >> Roassal3D is not supported anymore, you have to use Woden instead. Now
> >> when you have to load Woden, you can’t so you have to use the uber-long
> >> script on the Woden project page instead of conf. That’s why I’ve joked
> >> about using scripts instead of Metacello.
> >>
> >> Uko
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>> On 12 Jun 2015, at 12:25, Esteban Lorenzano <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> On 12 Jun 2015, at 10:40, Stephan Eggermont <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> On 12-06-15 10:24, Esteban Lorenzano wrote:
> >>>>> it was just an example of why using #stable in project dependences is a
> >>>>> bad idea :)
> >>>>> you made #releaseN.N to fix precisely my point.
> >>>>> there should exist something like I say “3.*”
> >>>> #'release3' always refers to the latest stable 3.*.*.*
> >>> I know :)
> >>> I’m just saying that I would like to have that as a standard mechanism,
> >>> not a convention.
> >>>
> >>> Esteban
> >>>
> >>>>> I’m sorry for being obvious here, I know this is known… problem is that
> >>>>> I’ve seen far too much the use of metacello not for doing releases but
> >>>>> to handle commits.
> >>>> I think it mostly has to do with the need to have exact reproducible
> >>>> builds (which is different from the need to have working software).
> >>>> That would be better handled with a (separate) SnapshotOf class i.m.o.
> >>>>
> >>>> Stephan
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
>
>
