> On 30 Jul 2015, at 10:27, p...@highoctane.be wrote: > > Most of the feedback is "won't fix" or "done in 4.x or 5.x" > All nice but hard to look at as day to day work is in 3.0
You have to move, you are missing out on all the nice stuff ! Seriously, I understand that you stay at what you know because things are probably already complex enough, but really upgrading is often easier than you think. > This effect will only get worse over time I guess. > > On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 9:04 AM, Marcus Denker <marcus.den...@inria.fr> wrote: > Hi, > > We have 622 open issues. There are *a lot* of old issues that nobody will > ever look at. > Please check those that *you* submitted to see what the status is! > > If it is just “would be nice”, but not even on a level that you yourself are > willing to even > send a mail to the mailing list to get people interested in helping you to > push the case > forward, maybe you could think about closing the issue? > > Maybe someone asked a question? If you submit an issue and there is a > question not answered > for a month, we should close it: How important can it be? Why should *I* > spend the time to fix > this issue if *you* are not even willing to answer a question in a minute? > > It makes no sense to have lots and lots of issues that are not important even > for the submitter. > > Another thing is that issues get fixed, subsystems replaced, code removed… > and the amazing thing > is that *never* the submitter of the original report closes it, even in these > obvious cases. > > The issue tracker is not a one way street! > > Marcus > > >
