I know that "bernardo" did many conversions now may be there are some left. So we should have a deprecation.

Stef

Le 10/8/15 18:22, Ben Coman a écrit :
On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 11:36 PM, Ferlicot D. Cyril
<cyril.ferli...@gmail.com> wrote:
Le 30/07/2015 09:04, Marcus Denker a écrit :
Hi,

We have 622 open issues. There are *a lot* of old issues that nobody will ever 
look at.
Please check those that *you* submitted to see what the status is!

If it is just “would be nice”, but not even on a level that you yourself are 
willing to even
send a mail to the mailing list to get people interested in helping you to push 
the case
forward, maybe you could think about closing the issue?

Maybe someone asked a question? If you submit an issue and there is a question 
not answered
for a month, we should close it: How important can it be? Why should *I* spend 
the time to fix
this issue if *you* are not even willing to answer a question in a minute?

It makes no sense to have lots and lots of issues that are not important even 
for the submitter.

Another thing is that issues get fixed, subsystems replaced, code removed… and 
the amazing thing
is that *never* the submitter of the original report closes it, even in these 
obvious cases.

The issue tracker is not a one way street!

       Marcus



I think we can close this issue:
https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/4399/deprecate-on-send-to-and-use-when-send-to

We deprecated Announcer>>on:send:to: and Announcer>>on:do: previously.

Do all senders need to be converted first?
cheers -ben




Reply via email to