Le 16/8/15 17:00, Sean P. DeNigris a écrit :
stepharo wrote
you get a project (group) with all your packages together ready to work ;)
Cool! I feel more and more that the standard "Package" pane is only useful
for... packaging, and when one takes off the dependency management hat and
puts the user hat on (i.e. most of the time), what you really want there is
a logical view of the system. So I see three use cases:
- Logical view of the system - I guess this was the original intention of
Categories, but has been hijacked by Monticello
- By project - which, as you just showed, we have now, yay!
- By package - the least useful, but primary (up til now), view
Indeed.
We will see what we get at the end but may be something like
MyProject
AnotherProject
System
LowLevel
And people will not be overwhelmed by hundreds of nice packages. :)
I think that touching package contents under the assumption that the
package list is too long in the UI
is the wrong way to look at the problem.
Packages are unit of deployment and we need Projects - unit of
knowledge. And the UI should shows both
depending on the view we want to get.
Stef
-----
Cheers,
Sean
--
View this message in context:
http://forum.world.st/Projects-are-slowly-getting-to-live-and-tp4843277p4843286.html
Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
