One of the things that annoy me is how many Configurations and Baselines pollute the package space that are of little interest to the user. It would be nice to group them and filter them out of Nautilus unless user asks for them.
I really like this new approach great work. On Sun, Aug 16, 2015 at 7:34 PM stepharo <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Le 16/8/15 17:00, Sean P. DeNigris a écrit : > > stepharo wrote > >> you get a project (group) with all your packages together ready to work > ;) > > Cool! I feel more and more that the standard "Package" pane is only > useful > > for... packaging, and when one takes off the dependency management hat > and > > puts the user hat on (i.e. most of the time), what you really want there > is > > a logical view of the system. So I see three use cases: > > - Logical view of the system - I guess this was the original intention of > > Categories, but has been hijacked by Monticello > > - By project - which, as you just showed, we have now, yay! > > - By package - the least useful, but primary (up til now), view > > Indeed. > We will see what we get at the end but may be something like > > MyProject > AnotherProject > System > LowLevel > > And people will not be overwhelmed by hundreds of nice packages. :) > > I think that touching package contents under the assumption that the > package list is too long in the UI > is the wrong way to look at the problem. > Packages are unit of deployment and we need Projects - unit of > knowledge. And the UI should shows both > depending on the view we want to get. > > Stef > > > > > > > > ----- > > Cheers, > > Sean > > -- > > View this message in context: > http://forum.world.st/Projects-are-slowly-getting-to-live-and-tp4843277p4843286.html > > Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Developers mailing list archive at > Nabble.com. > > > > > > > > >
