> On 14 Sep 2015, at 18:46, David T. Lewis <le...@mail.msen.com> wrote: > >> On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 8:25 PM, Esteban Lorenzano <esteba...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >>> >>>> On 14 Sep 2015, at 14:21, David T. Lewis <le...@mail.msen.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> No, OSProcess should not be included in the image. It is intended to be >>>> an external package. >>> >>> mmm⦠we want to include it as more and more people requires it and we >>> can profit from having it in the image (same as FFI). >>> why do you think it should be external? >> >> We should distinguish between having it traditionally-in-Image where >> that is the only place it exists and fixes are integrated, and the >> current trend (e.g. in-Image Glamorous Tools) where fixes are >> integrated "upstream" into an external package >> > > Yes, that is what I meant. > > Dave
Several packages are in that situation: Zinc, STON, FUEL, ... it works quite well.
