> > I would rename it to SmalltalkCompatibility to ANSICompatibility > > because > > "Compatibility" is a too general term and could mean backward > > compatibility > > of Pharo versions or compatibility to other languages as well. > > That was me :) I was thinking more broadly that over time the > "repository" might hold different packages Compatibility-ANSI, > Compatibility-VW, Compatibility-Dolphin. But maybe that is > overreaching and its better to be more focussed. Let me know what you > think on this and restate what you think the repository name should > be.
Ben, could you please give me a commit access? I intend to move Compatibility-SmalltalkX and Compatibility-ANSI (which I created and "maintain" for my own need). Maybe some others may find them useful or maybe even contribute. Cheers, Jan > > > Also see http://wiki.squeak.org/squeak/2384 and > > http://map.squeak.org/package/d7011055-4446-4b8e-b6da-e7e32d3389ec > > which could be a start. > > I saw those, but they interact with existing classes, so I thought it > easier to kickstart by loading in the tests first, which are all new > classes. I only created the repository since the tests were *hard* > to > find eventually at > http://www.spacmunke.org/svn/jst/trunk/src/test/ansi/ansi-compatibili > ty/ > So I thought it would be good make them more accessible as a > Monticello Package. > > cheers -ben > > P.S. I don't quite follow "to SmalltalkCompatibility to > ANSICompatibility" > do you mean "to SmalltalkCompatibility or ANSICompatibility" ? > > > > > > Gesendet: Dienstag, 08. September 2015 um 22:53 Uhr > > > Von: stepharo <[email protected]> > > > An: "Pharo Development List" <[email protected]> > > > Betreff: Re: [Pharo-dev] ANSICompatibility package > > > > > > We should have a SmalltalkCompatibility (not Ansi per se) package > > > were we can add some methods to help migration. > > > > > > Stef > > > > > > > > > Le 8/9/15 06:04, Ben Coman a écrit : > > > > On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 9:21 AM, Jan Vrany < > > > > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > is there actually such a thing like ANSICompatibility > > > > > package? > > > > > (it has been mentioned here lately, but I cannot find it) > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, Jan > > > > > > > > > I made it up for the purpose of discussion to see what interest > > > > it generated. > > > > Should we start one ? > > > > cheers -ben > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
