Thanks, Ben. Stuff copied. Cheers, Jan
On Fri, 2015-09-18 at 21:54 +0800, Ben Coman wrote: > Jan, Thanks for your contribution. Actually I hadn't uploaded > anything > yet since I was waiting on more votes on renaming, but to push ahead > I > settled on SmalltalkCompatibility [1], since I think the repo can > serve a wider purpose than just ANSI. > > I added you to the PharoExtras team. Hopefully that works. > > [1] http://smalltalkhub.com/#!/~PharoExtras/SmalltalkCompatibility > > cheers -ben > > On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 7:10 PM, Jan Vrany <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > > I would rename it to SmalltalkCompatibility to > > > > ANSICompatibility > > > > because "Compatibility" is a too general term and could mean > > > > backward compatibility > > > > of Pharo versions or compatibility to other languages as well. > > > > > > That was me :) I was thinking more broadly that over time the > > > "repository" might hold different packages Compatibility-ANSI, > > > Compatibility-VW, Compatibility-Dolphin. But maybe that is > > > overreaching and its better to be more focussed. Let me know what > > > you > > > think on this and restate what you think the repository name > > > should > > > be. > > > > Ben, could you please give me a commit access? I intend to > > move Compatibility-SmalltalkX and Compatibility-ANSI (which > > I created and "maintain" for my own need). Maybe some others > > may find them useful or maybe even contribute. > > > > Cheers, Jan > > > > > > > > > Also see http://wiki.squeak.org/squeak/2384 and > > > > http://map.squeak.org/package/d7011055-4446-4b8e-b6da-e7e32d338 > > > > 9ec > > > > which could be a start. > > > > > > I saw those, but they interact with existing classes, so I > > > thought it > > > easier to kickstart by loading in the tests first, which are all > > > new > > > classes. I only created the repository since the tests were > > > *hard* > > > to > > > find eventually at > > > http://www.spacmunke.org/svn/jst/trunk/src/test/ansi/ansi-compati > > > bili > > > ty/ > > > So I thought it would be good make them more accessible as a > > > Monticello Package. > > > > > > cheers -ben > > > > > > P.S. I don't quite follow "to SmalltalkCompatibility to > > > ANSICompatibility" > > > do you mean "to SmalltalkCompatibility or ANSICompatibility" ? > > > > > > > > > > > > Gesendet: Dienstag, 08. September 2015 um 22:53 Uhr > > > > > Von: stepharo <[email protected]> > > > > > An: "Pharo Development List" <[email protected]> > > > > > Betreff: Re: [Pharo-dev] ANSICompatibility package > > > > > > > > > > We should have a SmalltalkCompatibility (not Ansi per se) > > > > > package > > > > > were we can add some methods to help migration. > > > > > > > > > > Stef > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Le 8/9/15 06:04, Ben Coman a écrit : > > > > > > On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 9:21 AM, Jan Vrany < > > > > > > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > is there actually such a thing like ANSICompatibility > > > > > > > package? > > > > > > > (it has been mentioned here lately, but I cannot find it) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, Jan > > > > > > > > > > > > > I made it up for the purpose of discussion to see what > > > > > > interest > > > > > > it generated. > > > > > > Should we start one ? > > > > > > cheers -ben > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
