> On 11 ene 2016, at 2:19 p.m., Denis Kudriashov <[email protected]> wrote: > > > 2016-01-10 21:29 GMT+01:00 stepharo <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>>: > Especially it is commonly used scenario by senders of #critical:ifError:. > But it is different question. > I propose change ifError: to cull error instance. > > What you think? Can be put it in Pharo 5? Such change can touch some packages > So did you fix it? > > Not yet. I will do this when other my changes on Kernel will be integrated. > It gives me thoughts that Kernel should be splitter on small packages > +1111^1111111
We should make a list. Some that should be easy: - Delay should be splitted - Chronology should be splitted One more complicated: - InstructionClient and InstructionStream should be splitted And then, we should also review the API of basic objects Object methods size => 385 Integer methods size => 182 ...
