On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 11:52 PM, Guillermo Polito <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 11 ene 2016, at 2:19 p.m., Denis Kudriashov <[email protected]> wrote: > > > 2016-01-10 21:29 GMT+01:00 stepharo <[email protected]>: >>> >>> Especially it is commonly used scenario by senders of >>> #critical:ifError:. But it is different question. >>> I propose change ifError: to cull error instance. >>> >>> What you think? Can be put it in Pharo 5? Such change can touch some >>> packages >> >> So did you fix it? > > > Not yet. I will do this when other my changes on Kernel will be integrated. > It gives me thoughts that Kernel should be splitter on small packages > > +1111^1111111 > > We should make a list. Some that should be easy: > > - Delay should be splitted
I'll do Delay. I'm in the middle of cleaning it bit atm. https://pharo.fogbugz.com/default.asp?17375 cheers -ben > - Chronology should be splitted > > One more complicated: > > - InstructionClient and InstructionStream should be splitted > > And then, we should also review the API of basic objects > > Object methods size => 385 > Integer methods size => 182 > ...
