On Sat, Jan 16, 2016 at 7:25 PM, David Allouche <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On 16 Jan 2016, at 12:14, stepharo <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Le 16/1/16 09:59, David Allouche a écrit : >>> >>> But, really, this "list of dirty packages" should really only list dirty >>> packages. What is the use case for selecting a non-dirty package? >> >> because you never know >> Sometimes you save a package then you do a slice and you should be able to >> decide. > > That does not make sense to me. I guess it will, when I understand Monticello > better. > >
Its a very corner case. I've had to do it on occasion but I can't exactly remember the circumstance. Now what might be useful is a checkbox for displaying non-dirty packages - so we only display the short list in the usual case. (??) cheers -ben
