> On 16 Jan 2016, at 14:44, Ben Coman <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Sat, Jan 16, 2016 at 7:25 PM, David Allouche <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> On 16 Jan 2016, at 12:14, stepharo <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> Le 16/1/16 09:59, David Allouche a écrit : >>>> >>>> But, really, this "list of dirty packages" should really only list dirty >>>> packages. What is the use case for selecting a non-dirty package? >>> >>> because you never know >>> Sometimes you save a package then you do a slice and you should be able to >>> decide. >> >> That does not make sense to me. I guess it will, when I understand >> Monticello better. >> >> > > Its a very corner case. I've had to do it on occasion but I can't > exactly remember the circumstance. Now what might be useful is a > checkbox for displaying non-dirty packages - so we only display the > short list in the usual case. (??)
+100 it is very confusing right now > cheers -ben >
