On Wed, 20 Jan 2016 at 3:37 AM stepharo <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hmm. Thanks for describing this way of working. > > Here is the thing. We observed users working with this, and they all used > predominantly the keyboard. So, we favored keyboard use. This is not an > argument for anything, and it does not mean that that is the best design, I > am just telling you how we designed it. Things can change, and this is why it > is important to understand how people tend to use the UI. > > So, every (and only) selection has actions. In your example, the #Menu > category has a right arrow next to it. If you click on that you “Dive in > category”. That means that if you want to dive in #Implementors, you navigate > there, and then you get the option of diving in. > > We consciously chose to not show all actions all the time because that would > have led to an overcrowded UI with too many things to choose from. Right now, > you have 5 main things to click on and that is it. > > Now, hearing your scenario, it seems to make sense to make the category > clickable as well and make it dive in that category. We will look at it (or > maybe someone else does it beforehand :)). Thanks. > > Does this make more sense now? > > > Yes! I do not get why keyboard is orthogonal to direct access. > > To me what I hate in UI is UI that are showing information but do not let > you access it. > > How can I see that I can do something on the list? > The arrows only arrive when I click on ........ > So I was trying to click on the label and it did not work. Of course I > must click on the first element > of the list so that the arrow show up on the element and the label!!!!! > >
+1. Its annoying that it takes two clicks to dive into categories like "Implementors" (one to click an item under the category to make the arrow appear, and then another to click on it) when it would only take one if that arrow for each category was always visible. cheers -ben > What??? > > Seriously doru. You should have asked UI blind like me to test > Spotter. > I would have recorded a session and you can see that there are > glitches that you do not even see. > I'm just continuously bumping on them. > This is why I could understand Spotter and use it only to find a > class. > > > > > > > > > This is why I like the grabbing possibility of file on mac via the icons > and the navigation from there > because I see the file it is in front of my nose and I do not to jump into > a file system (like a mail download folder > I have no clue where it is) to grab it. > So to me Spotter should offer the same. Show information and let me grab > it. Especially when this is on the suggstion > list. > > I do not understand how you solve the problem I got with shortcut btw. > > You see the point is the following. Diving can be frustrating. > If on click on the labl you get the list then it can work really well. > > Doru > > > Stef > > > > <icfedjib..png> > > --www.tudorgirba.comwww.feenk.com > > "When people care, great things can happen." > > > > > > > > >
