Re: [Pharo-dev] Rationale for RGClassDefinition>>definition?

[Nicolai Hess]

I don't know why it was defined like that. But for issue 17404 I changed
that.
Am 21.01.2016 12:15 vorm. schrieb "Stephan Eggermont" <step...@stack.nl>:

> is defined as
>         ^ self realClass definition
> instead of
>         ^self definitionSource
> and not two levels up at RGBehaviorDescription
> to make it work for MetaClass and Traits.
> Why is that?
>
> Stephan
>
>
>