2016-01-21 9:07 GMT+01:00 stepharo <[email protected]>: > I do not know now I would have love that veronica believed in tests. > the difference is the following > > > a RG cna either > - wrap and point to a living entity > - acts a dead one (representing a class on a disk) >
Yes, I was about to add a check for isActive/isPassive for RGClassDefinition, but this isAcitve/isPassive is only defined for Ringmethods not for Ring class (or behavior) definitions. > > This difference is expressed in the RGMethod and probably not well in > RGBehavior. > In fact for method I remember that there was another case. > > But it has an impact. > In fact a RGEntity should have a strategy attach to it that defines how to > get certain information > for such cases. > > Ring should be revisited with such scenarios in mind. > > Stef > > Le 21/1/16 07:48, Nicolai Hess a écrit : > > I don't know why it was defined like that. But for issue 17404 I changed > that. > Am 21.01.2016 12:15 vorm. schrieb "Stephan Eggermont" <[email protected]>: > >> is defined as >> ^ self realClass definition >> instead of >> ^self definitionSource >> and not two levels up at RGBehaviorDescription >> to make it work for MetaClass and Traits. >> Why is that? >> >> Stephan >> >> >> >
