Hi, I can add it, but can you give me a bit of context? Are we talking about references to BoxedFloat64 class?
Cheers. Uko > On 18 Feb 2016, at 13:55, Ben Coman <b...@openinworld.com> wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 8:52 PM, Nicolas Cellier > <nicolas.cellier.aka.n...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Beware, most client code should only refer to the visible façade Float and >> its API. >> BoxedFloat64 is an implementation detail and is VM dependent. >> We don't want client code to be VM dependent, do we? >> I hope those references to BoxedFloat64 are rare. > > Should there be a Quality Assistant rule for this? > cheers -ben > >> >> 2016-02-18 11:47 GMT+01:00 Nicolai Hess <nicolaih...@gmail.com>: >>> >>> Because we have compiled methods with BoxedFloat64 associations in the >>> methods literals, but the source code still shows only "Float". >>> >>> 17638 Browsing calls on BoxedFloat64 shows methods with reference to >>> BoxedFloat64 in the code >>> >>> >>> >> >
