2016-04-04 14:14 GMT+02:00 Igor Stasenko <[email protected]>: > > > On 4 April 2016 at 14:18, Stephan Eggermont <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On 04-04-16 11:58, Igor Stasenko wrote: >> >>> Apart from being 'cool to have', full-fledged word processing is not a >>> thing, that you dealing with on a daily basis in environment, like Pharo. >>> >> I'm sure that is the case for you. I wonder if that is the case for many >> Pharo users. >> AFAIK there are a lot of pillar users. >> >> AFAIK there are a lot of car drivers.. does it means Pharo should focus > development towards needs of car drivers? :) > > >> For me the problem with the TxText model is that it blocks the >> possibility of doing >> that later, if and when there is enough development capacity to invest in >> this. > > > Why you have such impression? I just said that primary focus was to > deliver model that works fine for our current needs. For something more > sophisticated simply we had no resources. Take that into account. > > I had no focus or plans for turning model into full-fledged word > processor in future. Right. But i don't see how the model could block such > development, if such need would arise at some point. >
> If you have doubts about model, feel free to point it out and we can > discuss details. > I was hoping for that sentence ! Regards, Thierry > >> >> Stephan >> >> > > -- > Best regards, > Igor Stasenko. >
