2016-04-04 16:02 GMT+02:00 [email protected] < [email protected]>:
> > On Apr 4, 2016 3:54 PM, "Igor Stasenko" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > On 4 April 2016 at 16:41, Stephan Eggermont <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> On 04-04-16 14:49, Igor Stasenko wrote: > >>> > >>> Oh, and aside all of that.. Making a full-fledged word processor is not > >>> just a regular engineering task. You need an expert of publishing, > expert > >>> in fonts and typography. That's right from the beginning. > >>> And i am not that expert in this domain(s). > >>> So, next time, when we start talking about things like page layouts, > >>> columns, margins, tabs, references and other stuff, first find an > expert > >>> who will be able to transform these terms into technical requirements. > >>> If you think it so simple, it is not: because all those terms came from > >>> paper-publishing domain, that existed even before first computer came > to > >>> existence. > >>> The capabilities of TxText and whether it will be capable to handle > well > >>> complexities of full-fledged word processing features, at this point, > >>> without having an expert is nothing but just a speculation. > >> > >> > >> I know enough about typesetting and producing technical documentation. > >> > > And i have no idea what typesetting means. I can only guess , since it > is compound from familiar 'type' and 'setting' words. > > And technical documentation.. now i start having a headache :) > > Is TxText part of the image? > It is. Five packages, 1609 + 2647 lines of code (excluding tests and styler). I think Denis has worked on it (and extended it). Thierry > Any configuration? > > Phil > > > >> > >> Stephan > >> > >> > > > > > > > > -- > > Best regards, > > Igor Stasenko. >
