On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 3:26 PM, Esteban Lorenzano <[email protected]>
wrote:

> But well… is done :)
> behold the new pharo-nosql organisation!
>
> https://github.com/pharo-nosql
>
> already running with travis ci (appveyor is on the way, in fact is done, I
> just need to modify the vm :P)
>
> btw, Martin: your replicaset changes broke mongotalk tests :P (first
> immediate positive feedback from moving there)
>

pull request created!


>
> Esteban
>
> On 09 Jun 2016, at 20:20, Esteban A. Maringolo <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> 2016-06-09 13:21 GMT-03:00 Martin Dias <[email protected]>:
>
> On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 9:07 AM, Yanni Chiu <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 2:58 AM, Esteban Lorenzano <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>
> And finally, more we move, more we have encourage to improve the tools,
> complete the missing parts…
>
>
> About a year ago I tried to use git for a project, but gave up because it
> was not clear to me what tools and processes should be used. Having an
> active project to follow (like PharoNoSQL) would maybe fill in the missing
> git knowledge I need.
>
> Yes, the same happened to me.
>
>
> Ditto here.
>
> I do use GitHub and Bitbucket for other projects, with branches, pull
> requests and all the jazz.
> But with Pharo I only used filetree, and I'm never know exactly how
> the changes are handled, what's all the metadata thing about, and so
> on. But maybe because I commited the same package to both an MC repo
> (STHub) and Git.
>
> Regards!
>
>
> Esteban A. Maringolo
>
>
>

Reply via email to