'NoSQL' covers a lot of ground.

I don't suppose anyone has done a redis interface?

> On Jun 9, 2016, at 15:54, Martin Dias <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 3:26 PM, Esteban Lorenzano <[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> But well… is done :)
> behold the new pharo-nosql organisation!
> 
> https://github.com/pharo-nosql <https://github.com/pharo-nosql>
> 
> already running with travis ci (appveyor is on the way, in fact is done, I 
> just need to modify the vm :P)
> 
> btw, Martin: your replicaset changes broke mongotalk tests :P (first 
> immediate positive feedback from moving there)
> 
> pull request created!
>  
> 
> Esteban
> 
>> On 09 Jun 2016, at 20:20, Esteban A. Maringolo <[email protected] 
>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>> 
>> 2016-06-09 13:21 GMT-03:00 Martin Dias <[email protected] 
>> <mailto:[email protected]>>:
>>> On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 9:07 AM, Yanni Chiu <[email protected] 
>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>>> On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 2:58 AM, Esteban Lorenzano <[email protected] 
>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>>
>>>> wrote:
>> 
>>>>> And finally, more we move, more we have encourage to improve the tools,
>>>>> complete the missing parts…
>> 
>>>> About a year ago I tried to use git for a project, but gave up because it
>>>> was not clear to me what tools and processes should be used. Having an
>>>> active project to follow (like PharoNoSQL) would maybe fill in the missing
>>>> git knowledge I need.
>>>> 
>>> Yes, the same happened to me.
>> 
>> Ditto here.
>> 
>> I do use GitHub and Bitbucket for other projects, with branches, pull
>> requests and all the jazz.
>> But with Pharo I only used filetree, and I'm never know exactly how
>> the changes are handled, what's all the metadata thing about, and so
>> on. But maybe because I commited the same package to both an MC repo
>> (STHub) and Git.
>> 
>> Regards!
>> 
>> 
>> Esteban A. Maringolo
>> 
> 
> 

Reply via email to