> On 18 Jun 2016, at 06:55, Marcus Denker <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> On 18 Jun 2016, at 05:29, Eliot Miranda <[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> >> Marcus, >> >> >> Marcus >> >> Yes, but using the byte code pc is a much much cheaper key, and just as >> unique. >> > > But why would I care to make this efficient? It’s a debug feature… > > And doing it on the AST is very nice for other reasons, e.g. as I next step I > will > add icons in the Editor for all the halt sends. For haltOnce, this will show > the state > and toggle the haltOnce to be “on” again.
So, first version (to be improved)… could this be implemented in term of byte code offset. Of course. Would it be nice? I doubt.
