On Sat, Jun 18, 2016 at 12:17 AM, Marcus Denker <[email protected]>
wrote:

>
> On 18 Jun 2016, at 06:55, Marcus Denker <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
> On 18 Jun 2016, at 05:29, Eliot Miranda <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Marcus,
>
>
>>         Marcus
>>
>
> Yes, but using the byte code pc is a much much cheaper key, and just as
> unique.
>
>
> But why would I care to make this efficient? It’s a debug feature…
>
> And doing it on the AST is very nice for other reasons, e.g. as I next
> step I will
> add icons in the Editor for all the halt sends. For haltOnce, this will
> show the state
> and toggle the haltOnce to be “on” again.
>
>
> So, first version (to be improved)…  could this be implemented in term of
> byte code offset. Of course.
> Would it be nice? I doubt.
>

Alas, poor Occam.  I knew him well.


>
>


-- 
_,,,^..^,,,_
best, Eliot

Reply via email to