> On 19 Aug 2016, at 17:35, Sean P. DeNigris <[email protected]> wrote: > > stepharo wrote >> Let me know. I do not care about examplar or sample. > > In the original thread [1]: > - The most popular naming option was for some combination of > exampleInstance, exampleCode, sampleInstance, and sampleCode because they > are both natural-sounding-to-native-ears and explicit. > - There was a small (Ben and I) consensus leaning specifically toward > <exampleCode> together with <sampleInstance>
That makes a lot of sense, so +1 And UI stuff would then be a case of <exampleCode> right, as side effect ? > - Exemplar (note it's not spelled exAmplar) is a bit obscure English > - There were some more exotic parameterized varieties discussed, but maybe > it's best to save those for a future evolution > > [1] > http://forum.world.st/lt-example-gt-pragmas-and-example-methods-use-cases-td4833428.html > > > > ----- > Cheers, > Sean > -- > View this message in context: > http://forum.world.st/example-examplar-tp4911728p4911947.html > Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >
