stepharo wrote
Let me know. I do not care about examplar or sample.
In the original thread [1]:
- The most popular naming option was for some combination of
exampleInstance, exampleCode, sampleInstance, and sampleCode because they
are both natural-sounding-to-native-ears and explicit.
- There was a small (Ben and I) consensus leaning specifically toward
<exampleCode> together with <sampleInstance>
That makes a lot of sense, so +1
And UI stuff would then be a case of <exampleCode> right, as side effect ?
Yes
So <sampleInstance> instead of <examplar>
Do we agree?
and I just do update the slice.
Stef
- Exemplar (note it's not spelled exAmplar) is a bit obscure English
- There were some more exotic parameterized varieties discussed, but maybe
it's best to save those for a future evolution
[1]
http://forum.world.st/lt-example-gt-pragmas-and-example-methods-use-cases-td4833428.html
-----
Cheers,
Sean
--
View this message in context:
http://forum.world.st/example-examplar-tp4911728p4911947.html
Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
