Hi, I like the FileSystem-Core-Tests more, because then we can also have FileSystem-Core-Rules and FileSystem-Core-Rules-Tests. But I think that the other way to think about this is that if you want to (un)load all the test from filesystem you just work with FileSystem-Tests and not do it individually for each submodule. However this is just my guess.
Uko > On 04 Sep 2016, at 10:17, stepharo <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi guys > > Sorry to be that dull and stupid but I do not get why (beside following the > seaside convention - and I do not understand it either) why the test package > for FileSystem-Core is named FileSystem-Tests-Core > > and not just > > FileSystem-Core-Tests > > like that we could have > > FileSystem-Core-Help > > FileSystem-Core-Examples > > And when we are looking for FileSystem-Core we can see automatically > FileSystem-Core-Tests > > Now we cannot. > > Stef > >
