As far as I understand, Iceberg uses RPackages. And RPackages do not
necessarily follow MC conventions.
-------- Original Message --------
<offtopic>
Wow, I do not know where that email came from O_o.
It looks a spammish email. Maybe it came from my phone?
If it happens again, please tell me so I can take action.
</offtopic>
Now in-topic: I agree with having conventions and with the tests one
particularly. But as you say, we should also think what are the
benefits in terms of tooling so people do not feel forced to use it:
they feel attracted to use it :).
-------- Original Message --------
No guillermo. This is really annoying.
With long package list like Collections* then you do not see well the
tests.
So we should check the bug like that we are free.
Je suis pas de place que no necesita activar gustamucho la 🎶 que
ya el otro lado
Le 4 sept. 2016 10:18, "stepharo" <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> a écrit :
Hi guys
Sorry to be that dull and stupid but I do not get why (beside
following the seaside convention - and I do not understand it
either) why the test package for FileSystem-Core is named
FileSystem-Tests-Core
and not just
FileSystem-Core-Tests
like that we could have
FileSystem-Core-Help
FileSystem-Core-Examples
And when we are looking for FileSystem-Core we can see
automatically FileSystem-Core-Tests
Now we cannot.
Stef
