Denis Kudriashov wrote > Yes, it is new implementation of remote smalltalk. Look at my blog for > details and docs > http://dionisiydk.blogspot.fr/2016/07/major-seamless-update.html
Wow! This is really awesome. I love that you don't have to have the classes loaded in the image to deal with the proxies. I've been running into a problem lately that I have many images with overlapping domains that need to talk to each other. It's gotten messy because by default I use SimplePersistence and it's easy to get into hairy situations where the data gets unsynced. Could Seamless be appropriate for general inter-image communication or is there a better alternative? ----- Cheers, Sean -- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/Ann-New-Seamless-version-0-9-0-tp4914168p4914366.html Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
