> On 12 Oct 2016, at 8:09 , Denis Kudriashov <dionisi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 2016-10-12 20:06 GMT+02:00 stepharo <steph...@free.fr 
> <mailto:steph...@free.fr>>:
> In fact I do not really like iconNamed: as a name for a setter (for menu 
> items and settings)
> May be it should be iconSelector: or buildIconNamed:
> because else we  will confuse iconNamed: which returns an icon and iconNamed: 
> that just sets the selector to retrieve the selector.
> What do you think?
> maybe #iconName:?

Isn't this exposing internal implementation details in the external API?
The end result is a menu or a setting displayed with the corresponding 
iconNamed: associated, no?


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail

Reply via email to