> And with message based approach this problem not exists at all. Yes, it has different tradeoffs. For example you have to fill in the parameters even if you want to ignore them, or it is difficult (maybe impossibe) to express a parameter matcher that considers the relationship of multiple arguments (for example /allow: mock recv: #a:b:; with: [:a :b | a > b]/).
But I dont want to go off topic. I just disagree that this arbitrary and subjective feature makes something "modern" or not. Anyways, good luck with Mocketry. -- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/Mocks-are-missing-in-Pharo-from-thread-OSProcess-is-missing-tp4920574p4921045.html Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
