Denis Kudriashov wrote > You can look at features here: > http://dionisiydk.blogspot.fr/2016/04/new-version-of-mocketry-30.html.
Ah, yes. I seem to recall one major hurdle for me was that each test needed everything wrapped in a block. Is that still the case? Could this be hidden somewhere in the mechanism? I also wonder whether Mocketry could be easily integrated with Phexample, as I really love the stacked test concept... Denis Kudriashov wrote > BabyMock could not be treated as modern mock library just because it uses > symbols instead of normal message sends. Even C# and Java mocks are based > on normal messages. In practice, I don't see why this makes such a big difference. What am I missing? ----- Cheers, Sean -- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/Mocks-are-missing-in-Pharo-from-thread-OSProcess-is-missing-tp4920574p4920911.html Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
