On Tue, 29 Nov 2016 09:58:41 +0100, Aliaksei Syrel <alex.sy...@gmail.com>
wrote:
"DataSource" is responsible for providing visual elements that represent
items in a data set.
who said that.
I could say exactly: DataSource is responsible to cut data so that they
are delivered by row or columns.
I don't see how word "Store" fits here, because DataSource does not
store anything.
Store in the sense of serving something.
DataSource is also not the best name since it is not a data source
itself.
Clearly not
An object that is now called DataSource, basically just knows a single
function that from mathematical point of view can be defined as >follows:
f: Object -> Morph . You see, it is a mapping, not a souse or store.
Cheers,
Alex
On 29 November 2016 at 09:44, Denis Kudriashov <dionisi...@gmail.com>
wrote:
2016-11-29 9:35 GMT+01:00 Esteban Lorenzano <esteba...@gmail.com>:
yes, something like TableCellSource or TableCellProvider is more
intention revealing.
No, because is not *just* a cell provider.TableDataSource, TableStore,
TableProvider, yes.
I kind of like “TableStore”.
And if we have TableMorph then this guy should be TableMorphStore IMO.
--
Using Opera's mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/
